GreatWritersFranzKafka

  • Subscribe to our RSS feed.
  • Twitter
  • StumbleUpon
  • Reddit
  • Facebook
  • Digg

Saturday, 11 May 2013

“I know that this steak doesn't exist”: To Imagine by Vilém Flusser

Posted on 00:11 by Unknown
The split in the life world between object and subject happened some two million years ago somewhere in East Africa. About forty thousand years ago, no doubt in a cave in southwestern Europe, the subject withdrew further into its subjectivity to get an overview of the objective circumstances in which it found itself. But at such a remove, things were no longer tangible, manifest, for no hand could reach them anymore. They could only be seen. They were merely appearances—objective circumstances turned into apparent, “phenomenal,” and therefore deceptive circumstances: in pursuit of an apparition, hands can miss the object. The subject is once again in doubt about the objectivity of its circumstances, and out of this doubt come observations and images.

Images are intended to serve as models for actions. For although they show only the surfaces of things, they still show relation­ships among things that no one would otherwise suspect. Images don’t show matter; they show what matters. And that allowed the hand to probe further into the circumstances than before. Image makers faced two obstacles, however. First, every observation is subjective, showing one instant from one standpoint, and second, every observation is ephemeral, for the standpoint is in constant motion. If images were to become models for actions, they had to be made accessible, intersubjective, and they had to be stabilized, stored. They had to be “published.”

The earliest image makers known to us (e.g., at Lascaux) fixed their observations on the walls of caves to make them accessible to others (to us as well); that is, they acted (for hands are required for this fixing), and did so in a new way, inasmuch as they used their hands not to grasp objects (e.g., bulls) but to manipulate surfaces to represent objects (e.g., bulls). They sought symbols, and the activity was about symbols, about a gesture in which the hands moved back from the object to address the depths of the subject in whom, so stimulated, a new level of consciousness was emerg­ing: the “imaginative.” And from this imaginative consciousness came the universe of traditional images, of symbolic content, the universe that would henceforth serve as a model for manipulating the environment (e.g., hunting bulls).

Symbols that are linked to content in this way are called codes and can be deciphered by initiates. To be intersubjective (to be decoded by others), each image must rest on a code known to a community (initiates), which is the reason images are called “tradi­tional” in this essay. Each image must be part of a chain of images, for if it were not in a tradition, it would not be decipherable. Of course, this doesn’t necessarily always work. That is what it means to “publish”: to put a subjective observation into the symbols of a social code. Of course, it doesn’t necessarily work. Because every observation is subjective, each new image brings some sort of new symbol into the code.

Each new image will therefore distinguish itself to some small degree from the previous one and so be an original. It will change the social code and inform society. That is just what the power of imagination is: it enables a society informed by images to generate continually new knowledge and experience and to keep reevaluating and responding to it.

Yet it is a dangerous anachronism to regard these constant changes in the image code as a developmental process and to speak of a “history of images” (e.g., from the bull paintings at Lascaux to those of Mesopotamia and Egypt) or to suppose that such a his­tory unfolds slowly in comparison to our own. For what makers of images set out to do was exactly not to be original and to inform society but rather to be as true as possible to previous images and to carry their tradition forward with as little noise as possible.

These makers tried to reduce their subjectivity to a minimum, an attitude that can be observed in so-called prehistoric cultures in the present. The African mask and the Indian textile are concerned with an unchanging, eternal code, a myth. To the extent the mask or the textile is original, it has failed.

The universe of traditional images is a magical and mythical universe, and if it nevertheless changed constantly, this was through unintentional coincidence, by accident. This is a prehistoric uni­verse. Only since linear texts appeared, and with them conceptual, historical consciousness—some four thousand years ago—can one rightly speak of a history of images. For only then did imagination begin to serve (and oppose) conceptual thinking, and only then did image makers concern themselves with being original, with deliberately introducing new symbols, with generating information. Only then was an accident no longer an oversight but rather an insight. Images of our time are infected with texts; they visualize texts. Our image makers’ imaginations are infected with conceptual thinking, with trying to hold processes still.

The universe of traditional images, not yet sullied with texts, is a world of magical content. It is a world of the eternal return of the same, in which everything lends meaning to everything else and anything can be meant by anything else. It is a world full of meanings, full of “gods" And human beings experienced this world as one permeated by trouble. That is the imaginative state of mind: everything carries meaning, everything must be appeased. It is a state of guilt and sin.


At first glance, technical images seem similar to the prehistoric images just discussed. But they are on an entirely different level of consciousness, and among them life proceeds in an entirely differ­ent atmosphere. Visualization is something completely different from depiction, something radically new, and will now be taken under consideration.

“I know that this steak doesn't exist” 

In: Into the Universe of Technical Images. Minnesota, 1985, pp. 11-13.
Email ThisBlogThis!Share to XShare to FacebookShare to Pinterest
Posted in | No comments
Newer Post Older Post Home

0 comments:

Post a Comment

Subscribe to: Post Comments (Atom)

Popular Posts

  • "A tiger - in Africa?" - Monty Python's The Meaning of Life (1983): The First Zulu War. Natal 1879 (not Glasgow)
    Democracy and humanitarianism have always been tarde marks of the British Army and have stamped its triumph throughout history, in the furth...
  • California Through the Lens of Hollywood by Dana Polan
    From the cartoons that I watched on television in my East Coast childhood, I remember what was for me a primary image of California. Several...
  • Most Evil Women in History: Satan's Daughter Elisabeth Förster-Nietzsche
    Elisabeth Förster-Nietzsche, (born July 10, 1846, Röcken, near Lützen, Prussia [Germany]—died Nov. 8, 1935, Weimar, Saxe-Weimar-Eisenach [G...
  • The Two versions of the Imaginary - Maurice Blanchot, The Space of Literature
    But what is the image? When there is nothing, the image finds in this nothing its necessary condition, but there it disappears. The image ne...
  • Poesia e Composição - A Inspiração e o Trabalho de Arte, João Cabral de Melo Neto (Versão Integral)
    (Conferência pronunciada na Biblioteca de São Paulo, em 13.11.52,no curso de Poética) A composição que para uns é o alto de aprisionar a poe...
  • Alien and the Monstrous-Feminine by Barbara Creed
    The science fiction horror film Alien (1979) is a complex representation of the monstrous-feminine in terms of the maternal figure as perce...
  • The God’s Script by Jorge Luis Borges
    The prison is deep and of stone; its form, that of a nearly perfect hemisphere, though the floor (also of stone) is somewhat less than a gre...
  • The Genius of Josef Lada
    The hugely popular illustrator, cartoonist, painter, and novelist, as well as a successful caricaturist and stage designer, Josef Lada was b...
  • Hegelianism For Dummies
    No doubt we are intelligent. But far from changing the face of the world, on stage we keep producing rabbits from our brain, and snow-white ...
  • The Mother of All Bubbles - Gordon Gekko - Wall Street: Money never sleeps
    You wanna know what the mother of all bubbles was? Us. The human race. Scientists call it the Cambrian Explosion, from the Cambrian fauna.It...

Blog Archive

  • ▼  2013 (133)
    • ►  August (6)
    • ►  July (11)
    • ►  June (22)
    • ▼  May (23)
      • The Human Condition (人間の條件) 1959-1961 by Masaki Ko...
      • Goethe in Hollywood and L.A. as Hell: Doctor Faust...
      • The Baroque Conspiracy: Jorge-Luis Borges by Gregg...
      • Muspilli - Weltenbrand nach alter Art
      • A Supernatural History of Destruction; or, Thomas ...
      • Mr. Eko Xango's Bitter End - Pardon Me by Ismael H...
      • Schwarze Sonne - Die Macht der Mythen und ihr Miss...
      • The Wagnerian Bomb
      • "One of the stupidest people I’ve ever met in my l...
      • And Along Come Tourists (2007) Am Ende Kommen Tour...
      • Midnight Estate by Velimir Khlebnikov
      • The Eternal Pilgrim Georges Moustaki: Ma Liberté
      • 毛澤東 Mao Zedong: a fat, bloody, lyrical, confuncion...
      • The Work of Art adn the Self-Reproduction of Art b...
      • Under the Sky of Our Beloved Mongolia
      • “I know that this steak doesn't exist”: To Imagine...
      • Further Reasons Why Poets Do Not Tell the Truth by...
      • "This Desert is the God" - Meister Eckhart
      • Lucifer In Starlight by George Meredith
      • Lyric Poetry after Auschwitz by Herbert Marcuse*
      • The Powerlessness of Kindness: Life And Fate by Va...
      • Vladimir Tatlin: "The Head of the Universe. Time a...
      • Ad Astra et Ultra: Rocket Man Wernher von Braun
    • ►  April (21)
    • ►  March (17)
    • ►  February (19)
    • ►  January (14)
  • ►  2012 (269)
    • ►  December (20)
    • ►  November (15)
    • ►  October (12)
    • ►  September (7)
    • ►  August (22)
    • ►  July (21)
    • ►  June (27)
    • ►  May (27)
    • ►  April (22)
    • ►  March (24)
    • ►  February (31)
    • ►  January (41)
  • ►  2011 (98)
    • ►  December (26)
    • ►  November (55)
    • ►  October (17)
Powered by Blogger.

About Me

Unknown
View my complete profile